Segolene Royal IS not for sale! Not for sale! A word hello!
Segolene Royal answered in the video on the words of Georges Freche suggesting that it had negotiated support for his candidacy against his reinstatement in the PS.
A little reminder for those who have forgotten why Georges Freche was expelled from the Socialist Party, Regional Chair of Languedoc-Roussillon, president of the Urban Community of Montpellier and Montpellier Councillor , there is a little less than two years, following his statements about the football team of France:
" In this team there are nine out of eleven Blacks . The normality there would be three or four. It would be a reflection of society. But then, if there are so many, it's because whites are void. I am ashamed for this country. Soon there will be eleven Blacks. When I see certain football teams, I'm hurt. "
She answered the reporter very clearly:" In your opinion, is what you think it's my way of doing that! "
How can someone who advocates a mixed France Could reinstate a man who uses words as xenophobic! It's unthinkable!
How to want to have his membership card, be militant socialist and racist conduct is inconsistent, is not it?
To continue the idea of a reflection of society why Mr Freche not denounce Does not rather the fact that there are so few women in politics do we represent than half the population?! ...
Semaphore
On The Post , Najat Belkacem Vallaud meets the elected Languedoc-Roussillon that the Socialists promised reinstatement.
"If Ségolène Royal wins, I will be reinstated." So says the simplest way, Georges Freche in More Sunday on Canal Plus. The socialist leader has she told that it would be excluded reinstated its support in return? "Of course", replied the controversial president of the Regional Council of Languedoc-Roussillon excluded from the PS in 2007 for her remarks on the number of blacks in the France team football.
On The Post, Najat Belkacem Vallaud near Segolene Royal PS and Deputy Mayor of Lyon, denounced the "inappropriate comment" and denied any "combination" .
How do you react to what Georges Freche ?
"I have not heard, but anyway, Segolene Royal is definitely not in these practices rallying negotiations, much less in return for anything. "
" The idea itself is more comical than anything else. Segolene Royal has sufficiently demonstrated that it is not a scheming woman, a woman of tricks. The remarks by Georges Freche moved. And pretend to forget that the November 6 vote is a vote of activists, an individual vote. "
Georges Freche he lying?
" At Socialist Party, there are rules. This is a commission that ruled Georges Freche, for controversial remarks that Ségolène Royal was the first to condemn. Should be reinstated, it would be the same commission, not to Ségolène Royal, or anyone else to decide. What Mr Freche does not match the reality of the functioning of the PS. "
This commission going to be renewed after the convention?
" Yes, like all instances of the party. But the disputes committee is representative of the sensitivities within the PS, precisely so that its decisions are objective and do not depend directly on the party leadership. "
Georges Freche Why is it then that comment?
" We knows it all ... It has a propensity for provocation. Faced with this taste, it is best to avoid commenting. We are in a critical period where Ségolène Royal looking for the rally. It is important not to devote time to provocations. "
On The Post, Najat Belkacem Vallaud near Segolene Royal PS and Deputy Mayor of Lyon, denounced the "inappropriate comment" and denied any "combination" .
How do you react to what Georges Freche ? "I have not heard, but anyway, Segolene Royal is definitely not in these practices rallying negotiations, much less in return for anything. "
" The idea itself is more comical than anything else. Segolene Royal has sufficiently demonstrated that it is not a scheming woman, a woman of tricks. The remarks by Georges Freche moved. And pretend to forget that the November 6 vote is a vote of activists, an individual vote. "
Georges Freche he lying?
" At Socialist Party, there are rules. This is a commission that ruled Georges Freche, for controversial remarks that Ségolène Royal was the first to condemn. Should be reinstated, it would be the same commission, not to Ségolène Royal, or anyone else to decide. What Mr Freche does not match the reality of the functioning of the PS. "
This commission going to be renewed after the convention?
" Yes, like all instances of the party. But the disputes committee is representative of the sensitivities within the PS, precisely so that its decisions are objective and do not depend directly on the party leadership. "
Georges Freche Why is it then that comment?
" We knows it all ... It has a propensity for provocation. Faced with this taste, it is best to avoid commenting. We are in a critical period where Ségolène Royal looking for the rally. It is important not to devote time to provocations. "
( Sources: More Sunday, The Post)
0 comments:
Post a Comment